Use casesDocument review

Every answer with its evidence attached.

A contract, a brief, a claim file. The question is never just what it says. It is where it says it, what is missing and which decision still needs a person. We build document review that finds the source for every answer, names the gaps, catches the conflicts and keeps the human in the decision. Try it in your browser.

Start a project Arrange a call

What gets in the way

Someone has to read it. Hundreds of pages a week, looking for the dates, the amounts, the terms and the one line that contradicts another one forty pages back.

Hand it to a model and you get an answer. You do not get to see where it came from, what was not there, or whether two parts of the document disagree.

An answer without evidence is a guess with good grammar. For work that has to be right, it is not an answer at all.

What we build

The answer comes with the sentence it came from. Follow it back.

Every extracted answer points to the passage it came from, so a reviewer checks the source instead of trusting the summary.
What is not there is named. A missing date or amount shows as a gap, not as a plausible fill.
When two parts of a document disagree, both are shown and the conflict is flagged for a person.
The decision stays human. The system prepares the evidence, and a person makes the call with the source open.
The demo runs on fictional sample documents in your browser. Remove a detail, give it two different dates, and watch what changes.

How we know it works

The demo is the proof. Change the document and the answer changes with it.

Three samples: a complete brief, one with a missing detail and one with conflicting dates. Each shows how the review behaves when the document is not clean.
The instant preview runs with no model at all. AI review, when connected, runs through our own API under the same evidence rules.
The samples are fictional and say so. Nothing on the page claims a client result it does not have.

Try it

Live in the browser

An answer should come with evidence.

Hand it a document and get the answer with its source attached, the gaps named and the decision left to a person. Try the fictional samples, or your own text when AI review is connected.

Try the demo

Document review

Where it fits

Generative AI

Questions

Which documents does it handle?

The demo reads briefs. The same approach, answer plus source plus gap plus conflict, applies to contracts, claim files, invoices and forms. Each kind gets its own evidence rules.

Does it replace the reviewer?

No. It reads first and lays out the evidence, so the reviewer spends their time on the decision instead of the search. The call stays with a person, by design.

How is this different from asking a chatbot?

A chatbot gives you an answer. This gives you the answer, the sentence it came from, the things it could not find and the places the document disagrees with itself.

Bring us the project that matters most.

Tell us what you’re building and what’s in the way. You’ll hear back within 24 hours.

Start a project Arrange a call